<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" >

<channel>
	<title>Rants from the Hollow &#187; authenticity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.heiserhollow.net/tag/authenticity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.heiserhollow.net</link>
	<description>I have an opinion, and I&#039;m not afraid to use it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>To Tweak or not to Tweak, that is the digital darkroom question</title>
		<link>http://www.heiserhollow.net/2008/08/tweak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heiserhollow.net/2008/08/tweak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Heiser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authenticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CS3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital darkroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orphans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heiserhollow.net/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past year, I&#8217;ve enjoyed membership in the Bracknell Camera Club. The speakers, and competition judges, for that matter, seem to be chosen on the basis of how colorful they are. At least from my POV, growing up in America, some of these crusty old analog dudes are&#8230;..unusual. We had a neurosurgeon speak once. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heiserhollow.net/2008/08/tweak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A fake photo on the web? How could that happen?</title>
		<link>http://www.heiserhollow.net/2008/07/fake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heiserhollow.net/2008/07/fake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Heiser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photo integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authenticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital darkroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orphans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heiserhollow.net/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was claimed this month that a picture of an Iranian missile launch was doctored to look more significant. A recent Scientific American article asks Hany Farid (a researcher into digital forensics) how likely that is, and he offers several subtle clues to suggest that this image is not authentic. Digital Photographs are inherently vulnerable [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heiserhollow.net/2008/07/fake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

